More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Assured Shorthold tenancy
Benefits and care
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Regulation and planning
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

Time, distance & suitability


Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC. County Court at Central London. 1 December 2015

Thanks to the Housing: Recent Developments in the September 2016 edition of Legal Action for the note of this case.

This was a s.204 appeal of a s.202 review of suitability of temporary accommodation.

Tower Hamlets owed Ms B, and her four children then aged 10, 8, 3 and 2, the full housing duty. She had moved to the borough to stay at a refuge in September 2013, following long term domestic violence, and the children had begun school in the borough in October 2013. One of the children had a diagnosis of severe ADHD.

Tower Hamlets placed Ms B in out of borough temporary accommodation in Bexleyheath. This meant a daily commute of 5 hours to school and back each day for the children, causing considerable disruption to their education and well being.

In April 2015 a review of suitability was requested. On review Tower Hamlets upheld the suitability of the accommodation and said of the commute that the children must simply “bear the consequences of their mother’s decision” to continue their education in Tower Hamlets.

Ms B appealed the suitability of the location of the property and argued that Tower Hamlets had failed to consider properly the children’s best interests in compliance with its obligations under section 11 Children Act 2004.

The Recorder held that the review decision was unlawful as it did not contain a proper consideration of the needs and well-being of the children, particularly the disruption that would be caused by a change of schools.

There had been an alarming failure to apply the judgment of Lady Hale in Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 22 (our report) on the best interests of children in out of borough accommodation cases.

Appeal allowed with costs, and review decision quashed.


Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.



  1. Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround 270 » The Landlord Law Blog - […] was annoyed this week to read on Nearly Legal of a homelessness case where a family from Tower Hamlets…

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.