More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Assured Shorthold tenancy
Benefits and care
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Regulation and planning
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

The Unbeatable Litigant in Person*

By D

Birmingham City Council v Richard Lloyd (2012) CA Civ 23 May 2012
(On Lawtel but not on BAILLI)

A short note on this hearing as it is a situation which is likely to become far more common.

Birmingham Claimant had lost a claim for possession against L. They appealed. At the hearing of their appeal L attended without representation. He asked that the appeal be adjourned as his Public Funding had been withdrawn on the grounds that he had means. He was asking the LSC to reconsider that decision and they had asserted to him in a telephone call that they would reconsider their decision. The Council disputed the adjournment on the basis that if their appeal was successful the adjournment would keep them out of the property for an unreasonable period.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged that the reconsideration of the LSC was speculative and that they might in fact decide not to continue funding and so L may well appear before the court again without representation. However, there was no reason to disbelieve the content of the telephone call reported. Any prejudice to the Council would be slight due to an adjournment and the Council might well seek to rely on the decision made in the appeal as a case authority in future matters. This authority would be immeasurably better if L was represented and the arguments were fully canvassed before the Court so the delay could be seen as a benefit to the Council.

However, the Court was not prepared to allow a long delay. It adjourned the matter to July and made clear to L that the hearing of the appeal would proceed at the next attendance irrespective of whether he was represented.

Matter adjourned, costs reserved.

*All headlines by the Chief

D is a solicitor specialising in landlord and tenant matters with a London firm.


  1. chief

    The defendant’s run of good fortune came to an end in the Court of Appeal yesterday. The CA allowed the Council’s appeal and made a possession order against him.

    • Robert

      Does any one know where I could find a copy of the original judgement of the refusal to grant possession by Recorder Judge Del Fabbro made at Birmingham County Court. I know the date was 10th November 2010 but cant find the judgement anywhere

      • Giles Peaker

        As just a county court hearing, that judgment is very unlikely to have been published or reported. I suppose a transcript may have been obtained by Birmingham in the appeal.

        • Robert

          There was definitely a judgement somewhere. I think about 20 pages long. Very detailed about how the defendant ended up living in the property. I read it before online but cant find it anywhere.

        • Giles Peaker

          The Court of Appeal judgment allowing the appeal is on Lawtel.

          BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL v RICHARD LLOYD (2012) [2012] EWCA Civ 969

  2. Richard Lloyd

    How do i Get my name removed from this Website?

    • Giles Peaker

      I emailed you yesterday. If the email address in your comment isn’t valid, please email me via the ‘About’ page.



  1. UK Blawg Review #10 – Part 3 « Charon QC - [...] And Nearly Legal – a blog on Housing Law started many years ago by a lawyer who was then…

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.