More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Assured Shorthold tenancy
Benefits and care
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Regulation and planning
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

Fee hike for appeals from the LVT


The ministry of justice has just published its response [PDF] to its consultation on fees for the Lands Tribunal — now of course the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

This is bad news if you are an appellant. The fee for seeking permission to appeal from the Lands Tribunal (i.e. if it was not given by the LVT) goes up from £40 to £200; the fee for lodging the appeal from £50 to £250 and while the hearing fee remains at 2% of the amount determined by the tribunal, the minimum and maximum fees rise from £100-£5,000 to £250-£15,000.

The reason given for this huge rise is that the the tribunals service aims to recover 50% of its costs from fees. That was achieved in 1996 when fees were last set, but the percentage contribution of fees has fallen to only 20%.

Nevertheless the rise amounts to a 400% rise in fees (albeit a smaller rise in applicable thresholds) over a period when inflation amounted to less than 50%. In real terms it is now much more expensive to bring a claim in the LVT than it was back in 1996.

It is really disappointing to see LVT users so badly served by this. Successive governments have created a regime of leasehold law of mind-numbing complexity and given most (but not all) of it to statutory tribunals which are often unable to deal with a dispute in the way a court would — for example because of lack of jurisdiction or case management powers — but expect individuals who may have little or no available cash to make use of the system without even a statutory power to make a proper award of costs (and thus permit a reasonable CFA regime).

RPT appeal fees also go up.

1 Comment

  1. Paul

    Yes at [our property – address removed by J] the LVT have been involved for 10 years and achieved nothing ,plus do not have any Court enforcement powers so as in our position the Freeholder makes rings around them !


Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.