Request for info

Garden Court’s bulletin of 27 April includes a case note, Thornhill v Sita Metal Recycling Cambridge Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 162, on nuisance, possession of and interest in land. The upshot being that the nature of a claimant’s legal interest in land is by the by for a claim in nuisance, assuming that they are in possession of the land. Granted this is strongly suggested in Hunter v Canary Wharf, but unusual to see a judgment specifically on the topic.

It isn’t on Bailii or indeed Lawtel yet. I’d very much like to do a note on it (and it could also be very useful for me right now as well).

Does anyone have a transcript or copy judgment that they can send me? I’d be very grateful.

[Edit – I now have several copies of the note. Thanks to all. Apparently the full judgment isn’t out yet.]

About Giles Peaker

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts, and still is Nearly Legal on Google +.
Posted in Housing law - All, Nuisance, Possession and tagged , .

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.