More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Assured Shorthold tenancy
Benefits and care
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Regulation and planning
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

Mentioned in dispatches


A couple of cases came up today, one at the Court of Appeal, one Judicial Review, that are of marginal or tangential relevance to housing law, but may well be of interest to some. I’m not doing reports but the cases are:

Liverpool City Council, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon [2008] EWHC 1702 (Admin) on when and more specifically where a local authority’s duty to a ‘vulnerable young person’ arise under Children Act 1989. At issue was which local authority owed a duty where there was an initial refusal to accept the person was under 18 by one local authority and an intervening detention as asylum seeker, before release to the emergency care of another authority. The factual history is quite extraordinary. [Edit 28/7. Garden Court North have a useful commentary here]

Goldeagle Properties Ltd v Thornbury Court Ltd (Rev 1) [2008] EWCA Civ 864 on leasehold enfranchisement and specifically the notice period for applying to the Court for an order vesting interests in the nominee purchaser or deeming the notice withdrawn after an LVT determination pursuant to s.24 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.


Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.