Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Allocation
ASB
Assured Shorthold tenancy
assured-tenancy
Benefits and care
Deposits
Disrepair
Homeless
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Nuisance
Possession
Regulation and planning
right-to-buy
secure-tenancy
Succession
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment
20/06/2007

YL v Birmingham City Council and others

I haven’t had a chance to look at the judgment in full (YL (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (FC) (Appellant) v. Birmingham City Council and others [2007] UKHL 27), but the House of Lords has today decided 3 to 2 (Lord Bingham and Lady Hale dissenting), that a private care home place obtained and funded by a Local Authority pursuant to the National Assistance Act does not fall under the Human Rights Act, as the care Home is not carrying out a public function.

This will bear a close look as it might well have wider ramifications on private bodies carrying out public functions. Possibly more to follow…

[Edit 21 June.  Head of Legal has an interesting take on the judgments, suggesting exactly this.]

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.

7 Comments

  1. Marcin Tustin

    In substance, no change from what the position has always been when the House of Lords has considered this. That said, arguments on both sides are clearer and more coherent than ever. Expect the minority’s ideas to pop up in another claim or in legislation.

    Reply
  2. contact

    I’m not sure that it is more of the same. My concern is that this may have an impact on other areas where private bodies have been taken as performing a public function, e.g. Judicial Review of Housing Associations in performing some functions. I need to have a look at the judgments – but it is going to have to wait…

    Reply
  3. Lost

    Hmm how may YL apply if it was a charity that was given statutory powers to take children into care?

    Reply
    • NL

      Completely different situation, surely. If the charity is operating under statutory powers then it is either arguably a de facto public body, or is acting as the agent of a public body, carrying out a public function. Taking children into care is going to be a public function pretty indisputably.

      Reply
  4. Lost

    Thanks NL.
    I realised this when I had a moot topic on it, I argued against it anyway.

    Reply
  5. MM

    This seems like an interesting case and one that we’ve not heard the last of. What do you think would be the case if a local NHS trust delegated to a private hospital for emergency surgery to one of its patients that would have to wait for a place on the NHS? Outside its ambit or close enough to be subsumed?

    Reply
    • Tatiannah

      At that point, the private hospital will be performing a public function since it is acting with the direct authority delegated from a public body. It ought to be amenable to JR

      Reply

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.