Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Allocation
ASB
Assured Shorthold tenancy
assured-tenancy
Benefits and care
Deposits
Disrepair
Homeless
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Nuisance
Possession
Regulation and planning
right-to-buy
secure-tenancy
Succession
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment
11/10/2006

Mea Culpa, but not wholly.

Ok, so I’ve had to make an embarrasing addition to this post on the 5 year grace period for pay and holiday bonuses under the age discrimination regs. Pure laziness. No excuse (except I was knackered, overworked, blogging on a combination of wine and tannin and nobody else actually referenced the paragraph).

Also ‘loyalty’ is featured as a possible justification for holiday increments beyond that period. I still think loyalty is open to challenge -the need for loyalty both in benefiting the employer and in relation to competion for the attentions of the employee might need to be shown. Hmm. And the sex ‘n’ age combo is hopefully still open.

But I’ve learnt my lesson. I aim never to have to humiliating correct my own assertions in the future.

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.