More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Allocation
ASB
Assured Shorthold tenancy
assured-tenancy
Benefits and care
Deposits
Disrepair
Homeless
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Nuisance
Possession
Regulation and planning
right-to-buy
secure-tenancy
Succession
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

Bedroom tax news

08/05/2014

The Liberty backed Judicial Review of the bedroom tax on grounds of Art 8 discrimination against separated families has been given permission. There have been a few FTT decisions on this ground (see the FTT decisions page), so the JR will be quite decisive.

The CPAG/Rutherford Judicial Review, on disabled children needing overnight care, is down for hearing on 14 May 2014

A Statement of Reasons for a Camden FTT that we have already noted has been received [Statement of reasons here] It seems to base the decision as to whether a room is a bedroom on the physical characteristics of the rooms, including the state of repair (although the lack of natural light might be more decisive), but rejects an argument that having to move away from a support network would be discriminatory under Article 14 (disability). The Statement of Reasons has been added to the FTT page.

Share on Bluesky

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Bluesky. (No longer on Twitter). Known as NL round these parts.

5 Comments

  1. John Taylor

    The “bedroom tax” can only be cooked-up by a millionaire led government; by those who don’t know the true meaning of benefits. No-one else could even make it up. Roll-on 2015, can’t come soon enough.

    Reply
  2. Eleanor Smith

    I am classed as under occupation and paying the spare room subsidy due to my adult son leaving home. His old bedroom/box room is under 70sq ft so if I took in a lodger I would be classed as LEGALLY OVER OCCUPIED. The 1985 Housing Act states a room of that size is only suitable for someone under 10 years of age to use as a bedroom.
    My brain simply keeps telling me this “does not make sence”. But what can I do?

    Reply
    • Giles Peaker

      If the benefit authority will not change its decision, you will have to appeal to the first tier tribunal. You will find a number of successful appeals on room size here.

      Reply
  3. christine

    how do i start an appeal about my bedroom tax

    Reply
    • Giles Peaker

      Have a look at your local council website, it should have information and forms for appealing Housing Benefit decisions to the First Tier Tribunal.

      Reply

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.