Housing Ombudsman consultation

One of the less well-remarked upon changes in the Localism Act 2010 was a set of radical changes to the role of the Housing Ombudsman (the current incumbent being the lovely Mike Biles).  In short, the HO takes over jurisdiction for local authority housing complaints; there is a filter mechanism before the HO can accept a complaint (it has to be referred by a Designated person: MP, Councillor, Tenants Panel).  The former is to be welcomed – on one view, the HO now offers a far better, more modern, proactive service than the Local Government Ombudsman in our entrepreneurialised housing system; the latter is to be absolutely deprecated as being not just against the spirit of administrative justice but also as a mechanism for cost-saving in the face of proper redress of grievance/s.  Whatever you think about ombudspersons – and a range of views are expressed – there is no doubt that they have consistently exposed various maladministrations across the housing sphere, and they don’t hold back; in addition, their purpose (unlike courts) is to make things better for future “customers” so that there may well be an impact on service delivery from a single instance of maladministration (and not just in that organisation).

Anyway, the question for the HO is how to manage these new jurisdictions and restrictions.  A consultation document is available on their main web page for the new scheme (which must be approved by the Secretary of State) – responses due by 15.12.2012 to scheme@housing-ombudsman.org.uk).  In truth, that document is a bit dull and does not really get to the heart of the matter.  However, there is a further linked document which provides a little more information about how the HO sees the service developing.  In particular, for example, while the HO has no jurisdiction over these designated persons, it is clear that the relationship between them and the HO is crucial; and this document carefully sets out the HOs stall on that relationship:

We do not have any jurisdiction over designated persons, their decisions or processes. We will feed back on referrals from designated persons to enable good practice in complaints handling.  We will not comment on the merits of designated persons’ decisions but our challenge will be to support the improvement of process and approach.

It will be particularly interesting to see how that relationship develops; I would have liked to have seen the HO adopt a far tougher stance, particularly as regards tenants’ panels, which are something of an unknown in a disputing context.  The other major change, it seems to me, is that the HO will make its judgments more sensitive to include a specific judgment about lower level maladministration.  The rest of it is the usual ombudsperson fare – the importance of local resolution of complaints, focus on outcomes etc.

I’d be very interested in anybody who has information about Tenant’s Panels (who they are/how they’re appointed/expectations etc), given their pivotal role in the scheme.  There’s an interesting research project there …

Posted in Uncategorized. RSS feed for this post and comments.

2 Comments

  1. Anon
    Posted 17/10/2012 at 5:57 pm | link to comment

    Why stop there? Why continue having separate Ombudsmen for Housing and Property? The roles and remit seem pretty similar with the main difference only being that one governs public sector landlords, the other private sector.

    After reading their annual reports, the Property Ombudsman seems to be much more efficent than the Housing Ombudsman in terms of cost per enquiry/complaint.

  2. Jess M
    Posted 18/10/2012 at 3:22 pm | link to comment

    One difference is that the Local Government Ombudsman names the councils at fault when it publishes details of an investigation – but the Housing Ombudsman doesn’t name housing associations. Interesting for transparency to see how this changes.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

css.php