Tag Archive for 'job'

Page 2 of 10

Do you remember the first time?

Pupil barrister Scribbler encounters a litigant-in-person in action for the first time, and he sounds like a classic of the genre, issuing against multiple defendants ‘so they could come to court to explain themselves’, regardless of whether they actually had much to do with the case.

Of course, it has to be said that there are people who conduct their own cases effectively and with considerable ability, but many are on a crusade for justice, ignoring the eminently sensible cautions set out by Jacquig at Bloody Relations (for family cases, but the general principles apply elsewhere), and all too often the lawyers on one side end up more or less … Read the full post

Legal Aid. Could be clearer. Will be smaller.

The judgment in Minister for Legal Aid v Main, R (on the application of) [2007] EWCA Civ 1147 might be of limited general applicability, concerning as it does the provision of ‘special case’ legal aid funding for inquests, but one passage in the judgment caught my eye:

The relevant statutory provisions and the non-statutory material are somewhat complex. We were shown extracts from a “Legal Services Commission Manual”, which purports to explain the applicable directions and guidance. However, it confuses matters by mixing material from various sources without precise attribution. We were told that it has now been replaced by a clearer document. Meanwhile, we are grateful to Miss Nathalie

Read the full post

Statistics can be fun at the SHLA

The Social Housing Law Association has released a ‘Policy Statement’ on the need for legal aid reform. Briefly, they claim that far too many weak cases are brought against social landlords by legally aided tenants and that the subsequent litigation costs to social landlords are unfair as s.11 protection means the landlord cannot recoup their costs even if they ‘win’. They want a tougher merits test by the LSC and, as a sweetner, suggest compensating by lifting the means test limit.

How they support this allegation about ‘weak cases’ being brought willy-nilly, apart from extreme hypotheticals, is by an attempt at statistics. This is what they say:

One way of

Read the full post

I may be some time…

Very very busy and very tired, I currently come home and just stare blankly at the demanding voracious maw of the blog monster-child. Being too shattered to come up with anything to stuff down its greedy gullet, I can only feel guilt at its piteous cries of abandonment. It’s like Eraserhead, honest.

Which is one way to say that I may not be posting for a while, depending. But I will at some point soon-ish, hand on heart.… Read the full post

Busy gets its reward

A very long, frantic and difficult day, without any lunch, but successful in a way that means the last week and a half of intense busyness was, in retrospect, worth it. I can’t give details, not only for reasons of anonymity, but because matters aren’t yet signed and sealed.

But can I just say – Good Result.

Oh and to my friend the opponent, don’t mess us around for over a year again, because it costs.

I might be able to catch up with a few posts now, depending.… Read the full post

Busy, Busy, Busy

I’m flat out at the moment. Even my usual posting windows of a Saturday or Sunday have seen me either too tired or working to manage a post. So all I can manage is to point to two cases for Housing people’s attention, to which I will return when I have time.

In the Admin Court
Gilboy, R (on the application of) v Liverpool City Council & Anor [2007] EWHC 2335 (Admin)
Article 6 Human Rights and demoted tenancy possession decision reviews.

In the Court of Appeal
Harouki v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2007] EWCA Civ 1000
Overcrowding, homelessness and Part VII applications.… Read the full post

Homelessness and Ex Parte Injunctions – a warning

Mr Justice Munby has issued a stern statement on the use and abuse of ex-parte injunction applications to the Administrative Court in R (Lawer) v Restormel Borough Council [2007] EWHC 2299 (Admin).

Covering failure to use the Pre-Action Protocol, non-disclosure of material evidence, unexplained delay and requests for unreasonable periods of notice for application for discharge (48 hours, in this case) in draft Orders, the Judgment marks the Admin Court getting distinctly annoyed at what are scathingly described as ‘prevailing professional approaches’ in both the Family and Administrative Courts.… Read the full post



row of sheds footer image
10 pages