<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weaver: Permission Refused</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/</link>
	<description>Housing law news and comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=3618#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but they don&#039;t like doing it.

I agree though.  It wouldn&#039;t be the first time they&#039;ve done it and I think this is a case where it was more than justified to do so.

As the decision of the CA is strictly obiter, I doubt it will be long before another case gets taken all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but they don&#8217;t like doing it.</p>
<p>I agree though.  It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time they&#8217;ve done it and I think this is a case where it was more than justified to do so.</p>
<p>As the decision of the CA is strictly obiter, I doubt it will be long before another case gets taken all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NL</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=3618#comment-255</guid>
		<description>But while it was academic for Ms Weaver, how could it be said to be generally academic? Broader public interest, surely, and there is sufficient precedent for the HoL giving permission in that regard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But while it was academic for Ms Weaver, how could it be said to be generally academic? Broader public interest, surely, and there is sufficient precedent for the HoL giving permission in that regard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=3618#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Surely its because the appeal itself was wholly academic?

That can be the only reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely its because the appeal itself was wholly academic?</p>
<p>That can be the only reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NL</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/11/weaver-permission-refused/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=3618#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I confess myself to be surprised. Not necessarily at the de facto outcome, but at the refusal of permission. Love to see reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess myself to be surprised. Not necessarily at the de facto outcome, but at the refusal of permission. Love to see reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
