An Arden Chambers Eflash has just announced that the Supreme Court have refused permission to appeal in R (Weaver) v L&Q.
We’ll try and get a link to the order ASAP.
In the meantime, our post on Weaver in the Court of Appeal is here.
Housing law news and comment
An Arden Chambers Eflash has just announced that the Supreme Court have refused permission to appeal in R (Weaver) v L&Q.
We’ll try and get a link to the order ASAP.
In the meantime, our post on Weaver in the Court of Appeal is here.
Print This Post
(507)
(6)
(36)
(35)
(50)
(53)
(18)
(35)
(28)
(90)
(10)
(35)
(34)
(27)
(14)
(137)
(14)
(21)
(104)
(12)
(44)
(22)
(14)
(257)

Not that Nearly Legal is officially or unofficially linked with HLPA at all and absolutely no money has changed hands, but lets face it, this is pretty much the conference for housing law practitioners and advisors.
Featuring Richard Drabble QC; Jan Luba QC; and Circuit and District judges' views from the County Court bench. Also featuring the TSA in person; experts on ASB, possession proceedings and tenancy deposits; mortgage possessions and family home trusts; travellers law; community care; homelessness law; and housing eligibility. Phew.
(What's more, nearly all of Nearly Legal will be there. Collect them all for a remarkably small prize).
15 December 2009 at the Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London.
Full conference details available here
6.5 hours CPD for both solicitors and barristers.
Registration online here
I confess myself to be surprised. Not necessarily at the de facto outcome, but at the refusal of permission. Love to see reasons.
Surely its because the appeal itself was wholly academic?
That can be the only reason.
But while it was academic for Ms Weaver, how could it be said to be generally academic? Broader public interest, surely, and there is sufficient precedent for the HoL giving permission in that regard…
Yeah, but they don’t like doing it.
I agree though. It wouldn’t be the first time they’ve done it and I think this is a case where it was more than justified to do so.
As the decision of the CA is strictly obiter, I doubt it will be long before another case gets taken all the way.