<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victory &#8211; Bjorge Lillelien style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=victory-bjorge-lillelien-style</link>
	<description>Housing law news and comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hoped that was the answer. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hoped that was the answer. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>He is sitting as a Section 9 judge as he often does in Chancery matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is sitting as a Section 9 judge as he often does in Chancery matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>Will HHJ Behrens QC be sitting as a deputy High Ct judge or are the cases in the county court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will HHJ Behrens QC be sitting as a deputy High Ct judge or are the cases in the county court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NL</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-4460</link>
		<dc:creator>NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-4460</guid>
		<description>Interesting, JS, thanks. I&#039;ve deleted Amanda&#039;s comment as requests like that are best done via direct email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, JS, thanks. I&#8217;ve deleted Amanda&#8217;s comment as requests like that are best done via direct email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>HHJ Behrens Q.C will be hearing preliminary issues in 9 test cases in the High Court in Leeds or Newcastle in mid October on very similar issues to Redstone. 

We shall be relying very heavily on the reasoning in it ! There is a significant chance that either way the cases will go further. 

The judgment in Redstone is on Lawtel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HHJ Behrens Q.C will be hearing preliminary issues in 9 test cases in the High Court in Leeds or Newcastle in mid October on very similar issues to Redstone. </p>
<p>We shall be relying very heavily on the reasoning in it ! There is a significant chance that either way the cases will go further. </p>
<p>The judgment in Redstone is on Lawtel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PropertyPSL &#124; Property Information</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>PropertyPSL &#124; Property Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-212</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] which bound the SRB buyer’s mortgage lender. Detailed coverage of the case is provided on the Nearly Legal website, and news coverage of the case can be seen on the BBC News website. Counsel acting on the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] which bound the SRB buyer’s mortgage lender. Detailed coverage of the case is provided on the Nearly Legal website, and news coverage of the case can be seen on the BBC News website. Counsel acting on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Will - I&#039;ve just emailed it to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will &#8211; I&#8217;ve just emailed it to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Stone</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I am a caseworker at Bristol Law Centre. I am currently assisting in a similar case. Could you email me a copy of the Judgement please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a caseworker at Bristol Law Centre. I am currently assisting in a similar case. Could you email me a copy of the Judgement please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Landlord Law Blog: Shelter victory in sale and rent back case</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>The Landlord Law Blog: Shelter victory in sale and rent back case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Housing charity Shelter are jubilant after succeeding in saving the home of Paul Amanda Jackson of Shrewsbury, where they had lived for over 20 years. According to the BBC report, Mr and Mrs Jackson entered a sale and rent back deal with a company, Repossessions Stopped, in 2005 after getting into mortgage arrears. However two years later they faced repossession from Repossessions Stopped&#039;s mortgage company after they fell into arrears with their mortgage payments. Apparently Repossessions Stopped (described by the Judge in this case as &#039;dishonest&#039;), had paid only &#163;63,000 for the property, despite it having a market value of &#163;100,000, and had assured Mr and Mrs Jackson that they could live in it for the rest of their lives.Thankfully for them, Shelter stepped in to assist and a judge at Birmingham County Court has ruled they can stay there and pay rent. The Shelter report states that His Honour Judge Worster has ruled that the family can either revert to being owner-occupiers, or rent the property for the rest of their lives, with their daughter inheriting the tenancy.The news reports I have seen just state the order made and not the legal reasons for them, so it will be interesting to read the report of the Judgement when it comes out.PS There is now an excellent analysis of the legal points on the Nearly Legal web-site here. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Housing charity Shelter are jubilant after succeeding in saving the home of Paul Amanda Jackson of Shrewsbury, where they had lived for over 20 years. According to the BBC report, Mr and Mrs Jackson entered a sale and rent back deal with a company, Repossessions Stopped, in 2005 after getting into mortgage arrears. However two years later they faced repossession from Repossessions Stopped&#8217;s mortgage company after they fell into arrears with their mortgage payments. Apparently Repossessions Stopped (described by the Judge in this case as &#8216;dishonest&#8217;), had paid only &#163;63,000 for the property, despite it having a market value of &#163;100,000, and had assured Mr and Mrs Jackson that they could live in it for the rest of their lives.Thankfully for them, Shelter stepped in to assist and a judge at Birmingham County Court has ruled they can stay there and pay rent. The Shelter report states that His Honour Judge Worster has ruled that the family can either revert to being owner-occupiers, or rent the property for the rest of their lives, with their daughter inheriting the tenancy.The news reports I have seen just state the order made and not the legal reasons for them, so it will be interesting to read the report of the Judgement when it comes out.PS There is now an excellent analysis of the legal points on the Nearly Legal web-site here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/07/victory-bjorge-lillelien-style/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1959#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Ye, having reflected on it overnight, I agree that most of this case will turn on its own facts. Some of the clever bits about what constitutes an overriding interest in this post 2002 Act world and the continued existance of the registration gap are of general application (albeit this is only a decision at county court level). My excitement is for the general justice of the result ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ye, having reflected on it overnight, I agree that most of this case will turn on its own facts. Some of the clever bits about what constitutes an overriding interest in this post 2002 Act world and the continued existance of the registration gap are of general application (albeit this is only a decision at county court level). My excitement is for the general justice of the result <img src='http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
