<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The difference in Doherty?</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2591</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:09:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2591</guid> <description>Thanks, JS. One to keep our eyes open for there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, JS. One to keep our eyes open for there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JS</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2590</link> <dc:creator>JS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2590</guid> <description>Pinnock has been listed floating for 2 days over 14-16 July</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinnock has been listed floating for 2 days over 14-16 July</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JS</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2589</link> <dc:creator>JS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:40:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2589</guid> <description>To the Court of Appeal indeed !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Court of Appeal indeed !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2588</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:27:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2588</guid> <description>Appeal to the Court of Appeal? We&#039;ll look forward to that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appeal to the Court of Appeal? We&#8217;ll look forward to that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JS</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2587</link> <dc:creator>JS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:41:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2587</guid> <description>Permission to appeal has been granted in Manchester City Council -v- Pinnock a case concerning a public law defence in demoted tenancy proceedings.
Cosic has been raised in this appeal. At present we understand it may well be heard in the summer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Permission to appeal has been granted in Manchester City Council -v- Pinnock a case concerning a public law defence in demoted tenancy proceedings.</p><p>Cosic has been raised in this appeal. At present we understand it may well be heard in the summer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2586</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2586</guid> <description>True, but then the Court of Appeal is going to consider itself bound on this issue by the House of Lords in Doherty, unless or until the HoL gets to deal with Cosic, Kay at the EctHR etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but then the Court of Appeal is going to consider itself bound on this issue by the House of Lords in Doherty, unless or until the HoL gets to deal with Cosic, Kay at the EctHR etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ben</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/the-difference-in-doherty/#comment-2585</link> <dc:creator>ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:01:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1328#comment-2585</guid> <description>No mention here of Cosic v Croatia, so far as I can see (though it came out before the date of the hearing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention here of Cosic v Croatia, so far as I can see (though it came out before the date of the hearing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
