<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Leasehold update</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/#comment-3443</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1380#comment-3443</guid> <description>A worse problem in terms of having to pay for documents with statutory effect is the use of BSI documents, e.g. in Part P (electrical) of the Building Regulations. These tend to be very expensive
(I must admit, in the case of the RICS document, the first hit I got was on a members&#039; only download, and I was worried that confidential documents were being used in legislation, so the current situation is not a bad as I first assumed.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A worse problem in terms of having to pay for documents with statutory effect is the use of BSI documents, e.g. in Part P (electrical) of the Building Regulations. These tend to be very expensive</p><p>(I must admit, in the case of the RICS document, the first hit I got was on a members&#8217; only download, and I was worried that confidential documents were being used in legislation, so the current situation is not a bad as I first assumed.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sharon</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/#comment-155</link> <dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1380#comment-155</guid> <description>Hi,
I totally agree that we should not have to pay for something that has statutory force.
Regards
Sharon
Leasehold Life and Leyton Wellington Management Ltd</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br
/> I totally agree that we should not have to pay for something that has statutory force.<br
/> Regards<br
/> Sharon<br
/> Leasehold Life and Leyton Wellington Management Ltd</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
