<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leasehold update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=leasehold-update</link>
	<description>Housing law news and comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/#comment-3443</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1380#comment-3443</guid>
		<description>A worse problem in terms of having to pay for documents with statutory effect is the use of BSI documents, e.g. in Part P (electrical) of the Building Regulations. These tend to be very expensive 

(I must admit, in the case of the RICS document, the first hit I got was on a members&#039; only download, and I was worried that confidential documents were being used in legislation, so the current situation is not a bad as I first assumed.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A worse problem in terms of having to pay for documents with statutory effect is the use of BSI documents, e.g. in Part P (electrical) of the Building Regulations. These tend to be very expensive </p>
<p>(I must admit, in the case of the RICS document, the first hit I got was on a members&#8217; only download, and I was worried that confidential documents were being used in legislation, so the current situation is not a bad as I first assumed.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/03/leasehold-update/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1380#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I totally agree that we should not have to pay for something that has statutory force.
Regards
Sharon
Leasehold Life and Leyton Wellington Management Ltd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I totally agree that we should not have to pay for something that has statutory force.<br />
Regards<br />
Sharon<br />
Leasehold Life and Leyton Wellington Management Ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
