<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On the Naughty Step &#8211; guest post</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: M</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2492</link> <dc:creator>M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2492</guid> <description>I was unaware when writing the above article that some of Dickens’ mortgages were arranged by Stephen Jones,  senior partner of Jones &amp; Poole Independent Mortgage Specialists.
In September the FSA banned Jones from trading, and imposed a fine of £100,000.  The Rhyl-based broker breached regulatory requirements.  Jones failed to ensure his customers could afford mortgages and did not keep records of income and expenditure, instead relying on general and undocumented discussions.  The regulator stated that Jones, together with his business partner Simon Poole (who escaped a ban but was fined £7,000), exposed 2,000 customers to the risk of receiving unsuitable advice and losing money.
The fine for Jones was reported to be the second largest fine of its kind.  Its size was justified because Jones had fraudulently applied for a mortgage in his own name and attempted to cover up wrongdoing prior to an FSA visit.  Jones arranged for customers to sign and backdate documents relating to already completed sales in an attempt to show the necessary documentation was completed.
Read the story here:
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2008/10/01/100-000-fine-for-north-wales-mortgage-broker-55578-21936018/
A well placed source tells me Dickens’ unsuccessful defence sought to distance him from his frauds by relying on the fact that some of the irregularities on his mortgage applications were very similar to those on other applications arranged by Jones.
I understand that Dickens’ personal assets now total little more than the £690,000 illegally obtained.  The man who once exploited, threatened and  intimidated those unfortunate enough to be unable to obtain decent housing is about to be homeless, as the family home is up for sale.  But there’s more.  The Inland Revenue are demanding £1.3 million, a figure based on Dickens’ own admissions about his income.   A bankruptcy petition is due to be heard shortly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was unaware when writing the above article that some of Dickens’ mortgages were arranged by Stephen Jones,  senior partner of Jones &amp; Poole Independent Mortgage Specialists.</p><p>In September the FSA banned Jones from trading, and imposed a fine of £100,000.  The Rhyl-based broker breached regulatory requirements.  Jones failed to ensure his customers could afford mortgages and did not keep records of income and expenditure, instead relying on general and undocumented discussions.  The regulator stated that Jones, together with his business partner Simon Poole (who escaped a ban but was fined £7,000), exposed 2,000 customers to the risk of receiving unsuitable advice and losing money.</p><p>The fine for Jones was reported to be the second largest fine of its kind.  Its size was justified because Jones had fraudulently applied for a mortgage in his own name and attempted to cover up wrongdoing prior to an FSA visit.  Jones arranged for customers to sign and backdate documents relating to already completed sales in an attempt to show the necessary documentation was completed.</p><p>Read the story here:</p><p><a
href="http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2008/10/01/100-000-fine-for-north-wales-mortgage-broker-55578-21936018/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2008/10/01/100-000-fine-for-north-wales-mortgage-broker-55578-21936018/</a></p><p>A well placed source tells me Dickens’ unsuccessful defence sought to distance him from his frauds by relying on the fact that some of the irregularities on his mortgage applications were very similar to those on other applications arranged by Jones.</p><p>I understand that Dickens’ personal assets now total little more than the £690,000 illegally obtained.  The man who once exploited, threatened and  intimidated those unfortunate enough to be unable to obtain decent housing is about to be homeless, as the family home is up for sale.  But there’s more.  The Inland Revenue are demanding £1.3 million, a figure based on Dickens’ own admissions about his income.   A bankruptcy petition is due to be heard shortly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2491</link> <dc:creator>M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2491</guid> <description>Steven Dickens was jailed today at his sentencing hearing, where he was given 21 months.
His partner Yasminah Jhurry was given a 140 hour community punishment order.  And Dickens&#039; 70-year-old mother, who the judge accepted was only a &#039;bit player&#039;, was given a conditional discharge for two years.  However her home is now under threat.
Confiscation orders are to be considered in August, according to the North Wales Weekly News:
http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/conwy-county-news/local-conwy-news/2009/02/02/steven-dickens-jailed-for-21-months-55578-22835961/
North Wales Police come out of this looking rather good.  Without their willingness to investigate and devote considerable resources to building a case Dickens would surely still be causing misery to many at the sharp end of the private rental market in Colwyn Bay, Llandudno and Penmaenmawr.
DCI Hanson commented: &quot;North Wales Police will continue to support our partners to tackle anti social behaviour&quot;.  Just as well really, as it appears one of their major partners needs all the support it can get.  The contrast provided by Conwy County Borough Council&#039;s repeated failures to respond adequately to reports of ASB or even understand what remedies they have at their disposal (as detailed in NL&#039;s post today on the latest in a long line of critical Ombudsman reports) could not be more striking.
Perhaps Conwy CBC should now, in a spirit of post-millennial realism, adapt Blair’s cherished maxim: “Sound tough on crime.  Sound tough on the causes of crime.  Do sweet FA.”
Hmm, not sure they’d get it past the scrutiny committee though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Dickens was jailed today at his sentencing hearing, where he was given 21 months.</p><p>His partner Yasminah Jhurry was given a 140 hour community punishment order.  And Dickens&#8217; 70-year-old mother, who the judge accepted was only a &#8216;bit player&#8217;, was given a conditional discharge for two years.  However her home is now under threat.</p><p>Confiscation orders are to be considered in August, according to the North Wales Weekly News:</p><p><a
href="http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/conwy-county-news/local-conwy-news/2009/02/02/steven-dickens-jailed-for-21-months-55578-22835961/" rel="nofollow">http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/conwy-county-news/local-conwy-news/2009/02/02/steven-dickens-jailed-for-21-months-55578-22835961/</a></p><p>North Wales Police come out of this looking rather good.  Without their willingness to investigate and devote considerable resources to building a case Dickens would surely still be causing misery to many at the sharp end of the private rental market in Colwyn Bay, Llandudno and Penmaenmawr.</p><p>DCI Hanson commented: &#8220;North Wales Police will continue to support our partners to tackle anti social behaviour&#8221;.  Just as well really, as it appears one of their major partners needs all the support it can get.  The contrast provided by Conwy County Borough Council&#8217;s repeated failures to respond adequately to reports of ASB or even understand what remedies they have at their disposal (as detailed in NL&#8217;s post today on the latest in a long line of critical Ombudsman reports) could not be more striking.</p><p>Perhaps Conwy CBC should now, in a spirit of post-millennial realism, adapt Blair’s cherished maxim: “Sound tough on crime.  Sound tough on the causes of crime.  Do sweet FA.”</p><p>Hmm, not sure they’d get it past the scrutiny committee though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich Jones</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2489</link> <dc:creator>Rich Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:59:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2489</guid> <description>couldnt happen to a nicer man. :-D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couldnt happen to a nicer man. :-D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2488</link> <dc:creator>M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:37:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2488</guid> <description>Given the nature and extent of the fraud one would certainly have thought so, but there doesn&#039;t appear to have been any mention in the press about this aspect of the case.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the nature and extent of the fraud one would certainly have thought so, but there doesn&#8217;t appear to have been any mention in the press about this aspect of the case.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2487</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:53:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2487</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know, but I&#039;d imagine they might be getting a few questions from the lenders and from the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. But the solicitor&#039;s duty to the lender wouldn&#039;t necessarily involve the details of the mortgage application. The mortgage brokers, on the the other hand...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;d imagine they might be getting a few questions from the lenders and from the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. But the solicitor&#8217;s duty to the lender wouldn&#8217;t necessarily involve the details of the mortgage application. The mortgage brokers, on the the other hand&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barry</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2486</link> <dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:32:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2486</guid> <description>Are his solicitors being investigated?  They must have signed certificates.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are his solicitors being investigated?  They must have signed certificates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Landlord Law Blog: The Dickens case</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2485</link> <dc:creator>The Landlord Law Blog: The Dickens case</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:09:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2485</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Those who have read articles here in the past about ASBO landlord Dickens will find an excellent report on the Nearly Legal site here. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Those who have read articles here in the past about ASBO landlord Dickens will find an excellent report on the Nearly Legal site here. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thoughts of Oscar</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/#comment-2490</link> <dc:creator>Thoughts of Oscar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=1089#comment-2490</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Very interesting piece has been brought to my attention, all allegations as I do not know the validity of it. However the links that are on the postings all seem valid.http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img
src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>Very interesting piece has been brought to my attention, all allegations as I do not know the validity of it. However the links that are on the postings all seem valid.<a
href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/" rel="nofollow">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2009/01/on-the-naughty-step-guest-post/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
