<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: So what</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: The Landlord Law Blog: August 2008</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/#comment-457</link> <dc:creator>The Landlord Law Blog: August 2008</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=649#comment-457</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] what is the final report from the Law Commission on their housing projects.The new legal team on Nearly Legal got in ahead of me with a rather depressing report, taking the view that the proposals are [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] what is the final report from the Law Commission on their housing projects.The new legal team on Nearly Legal got in ahead of me with a rather depressing report, taking the view that the proposals are [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/#comment-456</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:49:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=649#comment-456</guid> <description>On &#039;bad landlords&#039; Tessa Shepperson pointed to some interesting figures from the Deposit Protection Service, to the effect that 62% of landlords have failed to comply with the deposit scheme.
http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/tenancy-deposit-protection-62-failure.html
This suggests that it is not even regulation that is the issue, but adequate means of enforcement and the ability and will to do so. HMOs anyone?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8216;bad landlords&#8217; Tessa Shepperson pointed to some interesting figures from the Deposit Protection Service, to the effect that 62% of landlords have failed to comply with the deposit scheme.<br
/> <a
href="http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/tenancy-deposit-protection-62-failure.html" rel="nofollow">http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/tenancy-deposit-protection-62-failure.html</a></p><p>This suggests that it is not even regulation that is the issue, but adequate means of enforcement and the ability and will to do so. HMOs anyone?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/#comment-455</link> <dc:creator>J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:48:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=649#comment-455</guid> <description>Well, that certainly makes me inclined to respond to more consultation papers ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that certainly makes me inclined to respond to more consultation papers ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: housinganger</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/so-what/#comment-454</link> <dc:creator>housinganger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=649#comment-454</guid> <description>&#039;Ultimately ineffective&#039; should be New Labours motto</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Ultimately ineffective&#8217; should be New Labours motto</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
