Comments on: Enforcing positive covenants http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/ Housing law news and comment Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Michaelhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2113 Michael Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:55:08 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2113 Yes. I clicked off & clicked back on and hey presto! It worked. Yes.

I clicked off & clicked back on and hey presto! It worked.

]]> By: Nearly Legalhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2112 Nearly Legal Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:41:41 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2112 Michael, I noticed that recently while at work. Are you using Internet Explorer 6? The text seems to appear when you reload, or re-size the window. Very odd. I think it is something to do with IE 6 and italics. Michael, I noticed that recently while at work. Are you using Internet Explorer 6? The text seems to appear when you reload, or re-size the window. Very odd. I think it is something to do with IE 6 and italics.

]]> By: Michaelhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2111 Michael Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:18:37 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2111 NL, in a few of you articles, the content in quotes (ie between "S.609 HA 1985 states" and "The County Court held this did enable the Council...") is 'invisible'. Do I need to enable anything, or select a different view or... any other technical tips? NL, in a few of you articles, the content in quotes (ie between “S.609 HA 1985 states” and “The County Court held this did enable the Council…”) is ‘invisible’.

Do I need to enable anything, or select a different view or… any other technical tips?

]]> By: davehttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2110 dave Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:49:09 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2110 I've come to this one rather late in the day, after the Times report today. I agree that it must be right and the point is, on its face, trite - s 609 modifies the common law rule in LCC v Allen - but the decision must be really quite significant in the context of nominations agreements, more particularly so in these times of crisis when one can expect a shake up in RSL property ownership. I don't know how many LAs have made noms agreements using s 609 - probably not many - but they should probably revisit them! Academics have got a lot to answer for. I’ve come to this one rather late in the day, after the Times report today. I agree that it must be right and the point is, on its face, trite – s 609 modifies the common law rule in LCC v Allen – but the decision must be really quite significant in the context of nominations agreements, more particularly so in these times of crisis when one can expect a shake up in RSL property ownership. I don’t know how many LAs have made noms agreements using s 609 – probably not many – but they should probably revisit them! Academics have got a lot to answer for.

]]> By: Jhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2108 J Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:54:17 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2108 Well, at least now we have a binding decision and can all look forward to new updating supplements for our books! Well, at least now we have a binding decision and can all look forward to new updating supplements for our books!

]]> By: Nearly Legalhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2107 Nearly Legal Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:43:41 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2107 @J: Certainly the massed commentariat, including Andrew Arden QC and Profs Grant and Scammell got short shrift on the point. @J: Certainly the massed commentariat, including Andrew Arden QC and Profs Grant and Scammell got short shrift on the point.

]]> By: Jhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2106 J Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:32:06 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2106 Thank you! If you're Wycombe District Council and you're running such a brave point (ie, all land law on this topic is wrong!) then you must have been praying for a Court of Appeal made up of a PI lawyer, a tax lawyer and a shipping lawyer. The last thing you would have wanted is to see Lewison J (Kim Lewison QC, Falcon Chambers, Editor of Woodfall and general property law deity) making a guest appearance in the Court of Appeal. I wonder if he he even called on the other side? :-) J Thank you!
If you’re Wycombe District Council and you’re running such a brave point (ie, all land law on this topic is wrong!) then you must have been praying for a Court of Appeal made up of a PI lawyer, a tax lawyer and a shipping lawyer.

The last thing you would have wanted is to see Lewison J (Kim Lewison QC, Falcon Chambers, Editor of Woodfall and general property law deity) making a guest appearance in the Court of Appeal. I wonder if he he even called on the other side? :-)

J

]]> By: Local Search | Local Search Focus | LocalSearchFocus.comhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/08/enforcing-positive-covenants/#comment-2109 Local Search | Local Search Focus | LocalSearchFocus.com Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=596#comment-2109 <!--%kramer-pre%-->Enforcing positive covenantsPosted under Local Search<!--%kramer-post%--> links from TechnoratiEnforcing positive covenantsPosted under Local Search

]]>