<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housing and Regeneration Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/</link>
	<description>The Joy of Housing Law</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NL</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>NL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>Commencement for most of it, including the tolerated trespasser provisions is apparently aimed for 6 April 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commencement for most of it, including the tolerated trespasser provisions is apparently aimed for 6 April 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8767</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8767</guid>
		<description>Simon, 

Let's hope you're right about the demise of the ghastly PPO, if ever there was a judicial perversion-diversion of a social housing budget, that was it. 

There's nothing to suggest the will be any more disposed to granting OPOs as they were before, is there?  DJs will probably carry on as they did pre-H-v-Hall and the SPO should remain the order of choice.  

Come on, any subsequent costs incurred by non-compliance with c/r + the price of McD can't really be put down to the sloppy penmanship of the draftsman.  

Claire - the wise money's on a September commencement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope you&#8217;re right about the demise of the ghastly PPO, if ever there was a judicial perversion-diversion of a social housing budget, that was it. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing to suggest the will be any more disposed to granting OPOs as they were before, is there?  DJs will probably carry on as they did pre-H-v-Hall and the SPO should remain the order of choice.  </p>
<p>Come on, any subsequent costs incurred by non-compliance with c/r + the price of McD can&#8217;t really be put down to the sloppy penmanship of the draftsman.  </p>
<p>Claire - the wise money&#8217;s on a September commencement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8762</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8762</guid>
		<description>Do we have any commencement dates yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we have any commencement dates yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8392</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8392</guid>
		<description>Woops! The Act didn't deviate from the bill much apart from what was Schedule 10 is now Schedule 11! 

My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops! The Act didn&#8217;t deviate from the bill much apart from what was Schedule 10 is now Schedule 11! </p>
<p>My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>Ah, glad OPSI got their act together quickly, thanks for the link, NL.

The Bill was at a fairly early stage whilst I was prepping my dissertation but hasn't changed much. It's the death knoll for the PPO though... it will essentially now be just a more expensive form of adjournment! Will we see SPOs making a return in their place, do you think? Or just DJs being happier in themselves to more frequently give outright possession orders, preferring to 'exercise their discretion' at stay application stage? If so, that will end up costing tenants more money in application fees! Bummer.

Goodbye happy compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, glad OPSI got their act together quickly, thanks for the link, NL.</p>
<p>The Bill was at a fairly early stage whilst I was prepping my dissertation but hasn&#8217;t changed much. It&#8217;s the death knoll for the PPO though&#8230; it will essentially now be just a more expensive form of adjournment! Will we see SPOs making a return in their place, do you think? Or just DJs being happier in themselves to more frequently give outright possession orders, preferring to &#8216;exercise their discretion&#8217; at stay application stage? If so, that will end up costing tenants more money in application fees! Bummer.</p>
<p>Goodbye happy compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>OK found the act, now on OPSI - link above. Schedule 10 is to come into force:
"in relation to England, on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint; and different days may be appointed for different purposes or different areas,"

In fact the only set date is as follows:
The following provisions— 
(a) sections 294, 304 to 307, 310, 312, 313 and 319 and Schedule 13, and 
(b) section 321(1), and Schedule 16, so far as relating to the repeals in 
sections 125D(2), 128(2) and 136(2) of, and paragraph 13(5) of Schedule 
5 to, the Housing Act 1985 (c.68), 
come into force at the end of the period of 2 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK found the act, now on OPSI - link above. Schedule 10 is to come into force:<br />
&#8220;in relation to England, on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint; and different days may be appointed for different purposes or different areas,&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact the only set date is as follows:<br />
The following provisions—<br />
(a) sections 294, 304 to 307, 310, 312, 313 and 319 and Schedule 13, and<br />
(b) section 321(1), and Schedule 16, so far as relating to the repeals in<br />
sections 125D(2), 128(2) and 136(2) of, and paragraph 13(5) of Schedule<br />
5 to, the Housing Act 1985 (c.68),<br />
come into force at the end of the period of 2 months beginning with the day on which this Act is passed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8383</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8383</guid>
		<description>@Simon: No idea. I couldn't find the Act released yet or any commencement info. Anyway, if you did your dissertation on it, shouldn't you be telling me? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon: No idea. I couldn&#8217;t find the Act released yet or any commencement info. Anyway, if you did your dissertation on it, shouldn&#8217;t you be telling me? <img src='http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/07/housing-and-regeneration-bill/#comment-8375</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=538#comment-8375</guid>
		<description>Any idea when the controversial Schedule 10 will be commenced and become 'active law', oh seer? 

BTW - I got a first for my recent dissertation criticising the drafting of schedule 10. Cool, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea when the controversial Schedule 10 will be commenced and become &#8216;active law&#8217;, oh seer? </p>
<p>BTW - I got a first for my recent dissertation criticising the drafting of schedule 10. Cool, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
