<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On the naughty step</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1870</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:18:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1870</guid> <description>No need and on the contrary, it is tediously predictable, respectively.
And on that basis, comments are closed on this post.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need and on the contrary, it is tediously predictable, respectively.</p><p>And on that basis, comments are closed on this post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: peter</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1869</link> <dc:creator>peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:19:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1869</guid> <description>nl shall i provide you with a latin translation? come on this is the most exciting debate on your site</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nl shall i provide you with a latin translation? come on this is the most exciting debate on your site</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1868</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:39:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1868</guid> <description>Bye Emily.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bye Emily.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emily Caye</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1867</link> <dc:creator>Emily Caye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1867</guid> <description>NL : Aut tace aut loquere meliora silencio</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NL : Aut tace aut loquere meliora silencio</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1866</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1866</guid> <description>I take it that I was the pseudo lefty at issue, though I can&#039;t lay claim to being extraordinadire. But, to be honest, there are so many pseudo lefty housing lawyers knocking round the blog these days, it is hard to be sure.
Damn, I&#039;ve just realised the pseudo left wing etc allegation was in the version of the comment that I&#039;ve deleted as being (otherwise) identical. Let me quote the passage for the record...
&lt;blockquote&gt;I have to ask what were you really motivated by Mr. Psuedo left wing housing lawyer extraordinadire was it the black thing, a brown  thing a female thing or just a thing ?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sorry Emily - no intention to remove your invective, although, if I might make a suggestion for the future, a little originality is the spice of insult.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it that I was the pseudo lefty at issue, though I can&#8217;t lay claim to being extraordinadire. But, to be honest, there are so many pseudo lefty housing lawyers knocking round the blog these days, it is hard to be sure.</p><p>Damn, I&#8217;ve just realised the pseudo left wing etc allegation was in the version of the comment that I&#8217;ve deleted as being (otherwise) identical. Let me quote the passage for the record&#8230;</p><blockquote><p>I have to ask what were you really motivated by Mr. Psuedo left wing housing lawyer extraordinadire was it the black thing, a brown  thing a female thing or just a thing ?</p></blockquote><p>Sorry Emily &#8211; no intention to remove your invective, although, if I might make a suggestion for the future, a little originality is the spice of insult.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1865</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:11:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1865</guid> <description>As the person who usually does the naughty step posts, I can safely say that it is an equal opportunities affair, as a cursory examination of the other naughty step posts will show. It is purely a matter of whatever happens to catch my eye at the moment when I feel like writing one. Paul Saffron would have undoubtedly merited a step post, and would possibly have made a good one, but was either at the wrong time or I just didn&#039;t feel like it. I certainly don&#039;t do more than one a month, usually less, and there is, in fact, a naughty step post from May 2008, the month of Mr Saffron&#039;s case. It is &lt;a href=&quot;http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/05/on-the-naughty-step/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;.
Any objections, Emily? If you care to point fingers, I would be grateful if it was at least based on a cursory read through of the blog.
On the Karim case, the length of time spent on it here was, as should be clear, largely due to posted and emailed comments, threats of violence and abuse by a &#039;supporter&#039; of the Karims with inside knowledge and a remarkable way of denying on the record facts. It was also very funny. And that&#039;s another reason.
This is not a site based on journalistic or investigative reporting of dodgy solicitors. Just not our remit. So any accusation that we didn&#039;t report such and such a case is simply by the by. Unlike our posts on housing law, my occasional naughty steps are under no (self-imposed) duty to be thorough and comprehensive. And they are clearly, even gleefully, not. Of course, if you want to make the fact that one naughty step post of eight concerns a BME firm of solicitors into an accusation of systematic racism, you are welcome to have a go, but you will have to excuse me for not considering that there is any case to answer - meaning that any further accusations are going to have to be backed up by rather more than gestural name-calling in order to actually appear on the blog.
I&#039;ve also read Taleb. A mildly interesting critique of what we old pseudo lefty poseurs used to call mythical thinking among the market makers, but otherwise, ho hum. Agreed that the current situation is hardly a black swan, plenty of people have been predicting it for some time. They just got ignored.
Oh and I have deleted one of your comments on this post today on the basis that it is the same comment - nothing more sinister ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the person who usually does the naughty step posts, I can safely say that it is an equal opportunities affair, as a cursory examination of the other naughty step posts will show. It is purely a matter of whatever happens to catch my eye at the moment when I feel like writing one. Paul Saffron would have undoubtedly merited a step post, and would possibly have made a good one, but was either at the wrong time or I just didn&#8217;t feel like it. I certainly don&#8217;t do more than one a month, usually less, and there is, in fact, a naughty step post from May 2008, the month of Mr Saffron&#8217;s case. It is <a
href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/05/on-the-naughty-step/" rel="nofollow">this one</a>.</p><p>Any objections, Emily? If you care to point fingers, I would be grateful if it was at least based on a cursory read through of the blog.</p><p>On the Karim case, the length of time spent on it here was, as should be clear, largely due to posted and emailed comments, threats of violence and abuse by a &#8216;supporter&#8217; of the Karims with inside knowledge and a remarkable way of denying on the record facts. It was also very funny. And that&#8217;s another reason.</p><p>This is not a site based on journalistic or investigative reporting of dodgy solicitors. Just not our remit. So any accusation that we didn&#8217;t report such and such a case is simply by the by. Unlike our posts on housing law, my occasional naughty steps are under no (self-imposed) duty to be thorough and comprehensive. And they are clearly, even gleefully, not. Of course, if you want to make the fact that one naughty step post of eight concerns a BME firm of solicitors into an accusation of systematic racism, you are welcome to have a go, but you will have to excuse me for not considering that there is any case to answer &#8211; meaning that any further accusations are going to have to be backed up by rather more than gestural name-calling in order to actually appear on the blog.</p><p>I&#8217;ve also read Taleb. A mildly interesting critique of what we old pseudo lefty poseurs used to call mythical thinking among the market makers, but otherwise, ho hum. Agreed that the current situation is hardly a black swan, plenty of people have been predicting it for some time. They just got ignored.</p><p>Oh and I have deleted one of your comments on this post today on the basis that it is the same comment &#8211; nothing more sinister ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: simply wondered</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1864</link> <dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:54:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1864</guid> <description>while we are banging our respective drums, can i just mention sexism? &#039;Mr. Psuedo left wing housing lawyer extraordinadire&#039;[excellent word - hope it&#039;s not a typo!] (is that you nl? maybe you need it as a masthead) doesn&#039;t seem to have solved that particular problem of the british legal system yet. although the bar council clearly have, as the spiffy new pupillage portal (&#039;your gateway to disappointment - again&#039;TM) bears a lovely picture of no fewer than 2 (count them) women who we must assume are barristers. and one is a woc! i can almost hear the labi sifre rolling out across the lawns of lincoln&#039;s inn.
or maybe it simply means there are 2 whole pupillages available through olpas this year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while we are banging our respective drums, can i just mention sexism? &#8216;Mr. Psuedo left wing housing lawyer extraordinadire&#8217;[excellent word - hope it's not a typo!] (is that you nl? maybe you need it as a masthead) doesn&#8217;t seem to have solved that particular problem of the british legal system yet. although the bar council clearly have, as the spiffy new pupillage portal (&#8216;your gateway to disappointment &#8211; again&#8217;TM) bears a lovely picture of no fewer than 2 (count them) women who we must assume are barristers. and one is a woc! i can almost hear the labi sifre rolling out across the lawns of lincoln&#8217;s inn.<br
/> or maybe it simply means there are 2 whole pupillages available through olpas this year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emily Caye</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1863</link> <dc:creator>Emily Caye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1863</guid> <description>I actually read &quot;Fooled by Randonmness&quot;, by Lebanese Muslim Nasim Nicholas Taleb before the much vaunted &quot;Black Swan&quot; and have to surmise that the current economic downturn is not a black swan event.
On a more interesting note I was intrigued by the way the media covered the alleged wrongdoings of the Karim partnership which I believe included a legitimate beauty contest MNUK . On a crude analysis compare if you will the way this very site spent hours and days discussing the &quot;Karim&quot; case when not even a smidegeon of the time was spent on similar cases ie Paul Saffron from  renouned Radcliffes Le Brasseurs who despite pocketing over a £100,000 pounds from client money to spend on strippers was not given the same meaty discourse . Neither was Mcgoldrick who was struck off for swindling some of the most needy and disenfranchised of clients . I wonder what the real motivation was behind such detailed coverage even on this site . It seems on the face of it to be a black thing, a brown thing or a toxic comibination of black, brown and female .
In the words of Marshal Mathers iii would the real slim shady please stand up ?
Rudy Narayan RIP.
This debate will continue but when the media coverage of similar cases is so obviously systemically racist in that Paul Saffron does not even merit a cursory comment by this site and others get a wagon load of anlaysis it begs the question that Robert Nestor Marley so eloquently put in his musical masterpiece : &quot;War&quot; : &quot; Until the philosophy which holds one man superior to another is utterly destroyed and until the colour of a man&#039;s skin is of no more significance than the colour of his eyes .....I say&quot; I throughly recommend you fork out a tenner for this marvellous album. Stir It Up little darlin&#039;s .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually read &#8220;Fooled by Randonmness&#8221;, by Lebanese Muslim Nasim Nicholas Taleb before the much vaunted &#8220;Black Swan&#8221; and have to surmise that the current economic downturn is not a black swan event.</p><p>On a more interesting note I was intrigued by the way the media covered the alleged wrongdoings of the Karim partnership which I believe included a legitimate beauty contest MNUK . On a crude analysis compare if you will the way this very site spent hours and days discussing the &#8220;Karim&#8221; case when not even a smidegeon of the time was spent on similar cases ie Paul Saffron from  renouned Radcliffes Le Brasseurs who despite pocketing over a £100,000 pounds from client money to spend on strippers was not given the same meaty discourse . Neither was Mcgoldrick who was struck off for swindling some of the most needy and disenfranchised of clients . I wonder what the real motivation was behind such detailed coverage even on this site . It seems on the face of it to be a black thing, a brown thing or a toxic comibination of black, brown and female .</p><p>In the words of Marshal Mathers iii would the real slim shady please stand up ?</p><p>Rudy Narayan RIP.</p><p>This debate will continue but when the media coverage of similar cases is so obviously systemically racist in that Paul Saffron does not even merit a cursory comment by this site and others get a wagon load of anlaysis it begs the question that Robert Nestor Marley so eloquently put in his musical masterpiece : &#8220;War&#8221; : &#8221; Until the philosophy which holds one man superior to another is utterly destroyed and until the colour of a man&#8217;s skin is of no more significance than the colour of his eyes &#8230;..I say&#8221; I throughly recommend you fork out a tenner for this marvellous album. Stir It Up little darlin&#8217;s .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1862</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:54:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1862</guid> <description>No problem, William.
France, eh?  Liberté, égalité, fraternité
Et Vichy, et Le Penn. Bit under the belt that - especially from a self-confessed Francophile like me.
No, France.  Good shout.
As to who said Britain&#039;s a beacon of equality, I did.  It is a veritable &#039;La Convivencia&#039; Toledo - or a pre-war Beirut as described by NN Taleb.
Of course, the demise of our golden age could be as sudden and bloody as theirs.  But, again I borrow from NNT, we won&#039;t see it coming.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, William.</p><p>France, eh?  Liberté, égalité, fraternité</p><p>Et Vichy, et Le Penn. Bit under the belt that &#8211; especially from a self-confessed Francophile like me.</p><p>No, France.  Good shout.</p><p>As to who said Britain&#8217;s a beacon of equality, I did.  It is a veritable &#8216;La Convivencia&#8217; Toledo &#8211; or a pre-war Beirut as described by NN Taleb.</p><p>Of course, the demise of our golden age could be as sudden and bloody as theirs.  But, again I borrow from NNT, we won&#8217;t see it coming.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William Flack</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/06/on-the-naughty-step-3/#comment-1861</link> <dc:creator>William Flack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=491#comment-1861</guid> <description>Sorry if I appeared to ridicule you there Michael. No disrespect intended.
You asked for the name of a country which can compare with us. How about France? They may have their problems but hey! Who said Britain is a beacon of equality anyway?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I appeared to ridicule you there Michael. No disrespect intended.</p><p>You asked for the name of a country which can compare with us. How about France? They may have their problems but hey! Who said Britain is a beacon of equality anyway?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
