Comments on: Women’s refuges and homelessness http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/ The Joy of Housing Law Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:34:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: afifa http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-8372 afifa Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:29:22 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-8372 This is certainly a bad news for vulnerable women with children residing in Refuge... very disappointing !! This is certainly a bad news for vulnerable women with children residing in Refuge… very disappointing !!

]]> By: Nearly Legal http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-5649 Nearly Legal Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:09:12 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-5649 I have spent a while on it and can't see a way past it, I must admit. I have spent a while on it and can’t see a way past it, I must admit.

]]> By: Important judgment on women's refuges and homelessness | News | Garden Court North - Garden Court North Barrister Chambers http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-5647 Important judgment on women's refuges and homelessness | News | Garden Court North - Garden Court North Barrister Chambers Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:33:50 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-5647 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] > Nearlylegal blog on "Women's refuges and homeless" [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] > Nearlylegal blog on "Women’s refuges and homeless" [...]

]]> By: J http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-5646 J Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:56:54 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-5646 In policy terms it is a disapointing decision, I agree. I'd be surprised if the Sec. of State made an order exempting refuges, which means that there will now be a wave of s.204 appeals trying to apply the guidance contained in paras. 49 and 50. Try as I might though, I can't say that the substantive decision is wrong in law (and believe me, I've been trying since yesterday!) In policy terms it is a disapointing decision, I agree. I’d be surprised if the Sec. of State made an order exempting refuges, which means that there will now be a wave of s.204 appeals trying to apply the guidance contained in paras. 49 and 50.

Try as I might though, I can’t say that the substantive decision is wrong in law (and believe me, I’ve been trying since yesterday!)

]]> By: michael paget http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-5644 michael paget Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-5644 this is bad news indeed for Refuge organisations - they have always viewed their accommodation as temporary (in the general sense) this is bad news indeed for Refuge organisations - they have always viewed their accommodation as temporary (in the general sense)

]]> By: Family Lore http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-5651 Family Lore Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-5651 <!--%kramer-pre%-->interesting post<!--%kramer-post%--> links from Technoratiinteresting post

]]>