Comments on: Women's refuges and homelessness http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/ Housing law news and comment Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: afifahttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1664 afifa Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:29:22 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1664 This is certainly a bad news for vulnerable women with children residing in Refuge... very disappointing !! This is certainly a bad news for vulnerable women with children residing in Refuge… very disappointing !!

]]> By: Nearly Legalhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1662 Nearly Legal Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:09:12 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1662 I have spent a while on it and can't see a way past it, I must admit. I have spent a while on it and can’t see a way past it, I must admit.

]]> By: Important judgment on women's refuges and homelessness | News | Garden Court North - Garden Court North Barrister Chambershttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1661 Important judgment on women's refuges and homelessness | News | Garden Court North - Garden Court North Barrister Chambers Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:33:50 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1661 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] > Nearlylegal blog on "Women's refuges and homeless" [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> Kramer auto Pingback[...] > Nearlylegal blog on "Women’s refuges and homeless" [...]

]]> By: Jhttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1660 J Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:56:54 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1660 In policy terms it is a disapointing decision, I agree. I'd be surprised if the Sec. of State made an order exempting refuges, which means that there will now be a wave of s.204 appeals trying to apply the guidance contained in paras. 49 and 50. Try as I might though, I can't say that the substantive decision is wrong in law (and believe me, I've been trying since yesterday!) In policy terms it is a disapointing decision, I agree. I’d be surprised if the Sec. of State made an order exempting refuges, which means that there will now be a wave of s.204 appeals trying to apply the guidance contained in paras. 49 and 50.

Try as I might though, I can’t say that the substantive decision is wrong in law (and believe me, I’ve been trying since yesterday!)

]]> By: michael pagethttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1659 michael paget Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1659 this is bad news indeed for Refuge organisations - they have always viewed their accommodation as temporary (in the general sense) this is bad news indeed for Refuge organisations – they have always viewed their accommodation as temporary (in the general sense)

]]> By: Family Lorehttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/04/womens-refuges-and-homelessness/#comment-1663 Family Lore Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/?p=448#comment-1663 <!--%kramer-pre%-->interesting post<!--%kramer-post%--> links from Technoratiinteresting post

]]>