Comments on: Housing for children http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/housing-for-children/ Housing law news and comment Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: contacthttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/housing-for-children/#comment-1451 contact Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:08:11 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/housing-for-children/#comment-1451 Except that Hammersmith didn't actually lose. Their failings were publicly criticised, but they 'won' the case. Someone is always going to have to be the test case for a broader issue, so not an attractive winge from Lillis, I'd agree. Except that Hammersmith didn’t actually lose. Their failings were publicly criticised, but they ‘won’ the case.

Someone is always going to have to be the test case for a broader issue, so not an attractive winge from Lillis, I’d agree.

]]> By: Mark Phttp://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/housing-for-children/#comment-1450 Mark P Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:46:00 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/housing-for-children/#comment-1450 Have you seen the Inside Housing article on the Lords judgment in your News Feed? "Antony Lillis, cabinet member for community and children's services at Hammersmith & Fulham Council, said: 'We are disappointed that the Howard League chose to use this person to promote their own agenda.'" Nothing like showing dignity in defeat. Have you seen the Inside Housing article on the Lords judgment in your News Feed?

“Antony Lillis, cabinet member for community and children’s services at Hammersmith & Fulham Council, said: ‘We are disappointed that the Howard League chose to use this person to promote their own agenda.’”

Nothing like showing dignity in defeat.

]]>