<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Hierarchy of Need</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: jane</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1524</link> <dc:creator>jane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:15:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1524</guid> <description>hi,
just wanted to let you know that Shelter staff unfortunately have no option but to strike again for two days next week. Many staff who feel strongly about this feel that they cannot afford to strike, others feel pressurised to &#039;conform&#039;. Rumours are circulating that Union notices have been ripped off staff notice boards. Management offered staff a derisory £150 each( taxed) if they signed their contracts before a certain date.
Management are trying to divide and rule (1/management sending messages by email to staff who didnt strike only 2/ not allowing union stewards to email updates to all staff, only union members).
in our area staff are holding firm and are committed to the industrial action. Both for ourselves AND our clients, despite how selfish Adam Sampson, chief Exec at Shelter seems to think we are.
thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p><p>just wanted to let you know that Shelter staff unfortunately have no option but to strike again for two days next week. Many staff who feel strongly about this feel that they cannot afford to strike, others feel pressurised to &#8216;conform&#8217;. Rumours are circulating that Union notices have been ripped off staff notice boards. Management offered staff a derisory £150 each( taxed) if they signed their contracts before a certain date.</p><p>Management are trying to divide and rule (1/management sending messages by email to staff who didnt strike only 2/ not allowing union stewards to email updates to all staff, only union members).</p><p>in our area staff are holding firm and are committed to the industrial action. Both for ourselves AND our clients, despite how selfish Adam Sampson, chief Exec at Shelter seems to think we are.</p><p>thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nearly Legal</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1523</link> <dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1523</guid> <description>Thanks Ben. Interesting stuff and a familiar argument from the Shelter managment. One must pay more to get top-end staff, to be competitive with the private sector. Yet to be competitive with the private sector in getting contracts one must cut the pay of (skilled) junior staff. One can only presume that there is no need to attract or retain skilled staff at the front-line level.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ben. Interesting stuff and a familiar argument from the Shelter managment. One must pay more to get top-end staff, to be competitive with the private sector. Yet to be competitive with the private sector in getting contracts one must cut the pay of (skilled) junior staff. One can only presume that there is no need to attract or retain skilled staff at the front-line level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1522</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1522</guid> <description>There&#039;s an interesting series of comments here: http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/2/26/163659/702 (Labourhome of all places!) where someone wades through the Shelter annual reports looking at top-end salaries. Seems that salaries at the top of the organisation may not be subject to the same pressures as those at the bottom.
Love the blog - keep up the good work.
cheers,
Ben</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting series of comments here: <a
href="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/2/26/163659/702" rel="nofollow">http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/2/26/163659/702</a> (Labourhome of all places!) where someone wades through the Shelter annual reports looking at top-end salaries. Seems that salaries at the top of the organisation may not be subject to the same pressures as those at the bottom.</p><p>Love the blog &#8211; keep up the good work.</p><p>cheers,</p><p>Ben</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: housinganger</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1521</link> <dc:creator>housinganger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:52:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/hierarchy-of-need/#comment-1521</guid> <description>Spot on I reckon in that the LSC are trying to turn away from old style advice provision to new style glorified call centres probably run by Crapita, sorry Capita, who can come up with impressive statistics of how many thousands more clients they have &#039;helped&#039; (helped being rather a subjective word here).
If no one speaks for the Homeless who are denied there approaches, help, benefits, a chance in life etc, then what&#039;s to stop a statistic obsessed government pushing forward reforms that will see the provision of quality AND effective advice and assistance being reduced.
I guess the likes of Shelter can either decide to stand up to these reforms and form a united front with other advice providers such as the CAB and other Law Centres or just decide not to bite the hand that feeds them and be further manipulated by el governmento!
In my nightmares I can see an 0845 number for all Civil Legal Advice!
&#039;Got a problem, just phone &#039;Housing Advice Direct&#039; where our regionally trained operatives will answer YOUR problem&#039;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on I reckon in that the LSC are trying to turn away from old style advice provision to new style glorified call centres probably run by Crapita, sorry Capita, who can come up with impressive statistics of how many thousands more clients they have &#8216;helped&#8217; (helped being rather a subjective word here).</p><p>If no one speaks for the Homeless who are denied there approaches, help, benefits, a chance in life etc, then what&#8217;s to stop a statistic obsessed government pushing forward reforms that will see the provision of quality AND effective advice and assistance being reduced.</p><p>I guess the likes of Shelter can either decide to stand up to these reforms and form a united front with other advice providers such as the CAB and other Law Centres or just decide not to bite the hand that feeds them and be further manipulated by el governmento!</p><p>In my nightmares I can see an 0845 number for all Civil Legal Advice!</p><p>&#8216;Got a problem, just phone &#8216;Housing Advice Direct&#8217; where our regionally trained operatives will answer YOUR problem&#8217;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
