<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accidentally Secure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/</link>
	<description>The Joy of Housing Law</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>Mansfield is now on Lawtel. Let me know if you need a copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mansfield is now on Lawtel. Let me know if you need a copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contact</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>contact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5141</guid>
		<description>Simon, you are quite right, as even a moment's reflection would have told me. I had, in what can only be a crazed moment of tiredness, thought it might avoid that section. But of course it wouldn't. Post edited accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, you are quite right, as even a moment&#8217;s reflection would have told me. I had, in what can only be a crazed moment of tiredness, thought it might avoid that section. But of course it wouldn&#8217;t. Post edited accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5137</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/03/accidentally-secure/#comment-5137</guid>
		<description>Would the situation you described of, 'a licence for temporary accommodation after homeless application or post accepting duty' not be covered by by Schedule 1(4) of the Housing Act 1985??

"4. Accommodation for homeless persons
A tenancy granted in pursuance of any function under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996 (homelessness) is not a secure tenancy unless the local housing authority concerned have notified the tenant that the tenancy is to be regarded as a secure tenancy"

If a tenancy granted in pursuance of such provisions can't be regarded as secure, then I'm sure that a licence in pursuance of the same provisions similarly couldn't be regarded as secure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would the situation you described of, &#8216;a licence for temporary accommodation after homeless application or post accepting duty&#8217; not be covered by by Schedule 1(4) of the Housing Act 1985??</p>
<p>&#8220;4. Accommodation for homeless persons<br />
A tenancy granted in pursuance of any function under Part VII of the Housing Act 1996 (homelessness) is not a secure tenancy unless the local housing authority concerned have notified the tenant that the tenancy is to be regarded as a secure tenancy&#8221;</p>
<p>If a tenancy granted in pursuance of such provisions can&#8217;t be regarded as secure, then I&#8217;m sure that a licence in pursuance of the same provisions similarly couldn&#8217;t be regarded as secure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
