Comments on: The Crown as squatter http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/the-crown-as-squatter/ The Joy of Housing Law Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:02:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: contact http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/the-crown-as-squatter/#comment-5039 contact Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:54:38 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/the-crown-as-squatter/#comment-5039 Hence the 'ancient manorial' ownership based challenge, apparently and unsurprisingly based on Welsh law/lore. Even the NT doesn't get to own the area of shore exposed between high tide line and low tide line, AFAIR. Can you get onto the blog from home now? My cup overfloweth. Hence the ‘ancient manorial’ ownership based challenge, apparently and unsurprisingly based on Welsh law/lore.

Even the NT doesn’t get to own the area of shore exposed between high tide line and low tide line, AFAIR.

Can you get onto the blog from home now? My cup overfloweth.

]]> By: advocatus diaboli http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/the-crown-as-squatter/#comment-5034 advocatus diaboli Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:56:10 +0000 http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/the-crown-as-squatter/#comment-5034 I haven't read the case (yet!) so this may well be off the mark, but I thought all foreshore was owned by the crown unless there has been a grant or sale of a stretch of it to someone else (usually a local authority, National Trust, etc). Will go and read the case now I think - very interesting..... AD :-) PS Now that I can get back on your blog there'll be no stopping me! I haven’t read the case (yet!) so this may well be off the mark, but I thought all foreshore was owned by the crown unless there has been a grant or sale of a stretch of it to someone else (usually a local authority, National Trust, etc). Will go and read the case now I think - very interesting….. AD :-)
PS Now that I can get back on your blog there’ll be no stopping me!

]]>