<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Catching up &#8211; s.21 and tenants&#039; deposits</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/09/catching-up-s21-and-tenants-deposits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/09/catching-up-s21-and-tenants-deposits/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: NL</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/09/catching-up-s21-and-tenants-deposits/#comment-1132</link> <dc:creator>NL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/290#comment-1132</guid> <description>Sadly, I have to say that I have heard of County Court judgments that have found both ways - it does fall under the rules and it doesn&#039;t fall under the rules. So the answer is it hasn&#039;t been clarified and currently it is roulette by District Judge.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I have to say that I have heard of County Court judgments that have found both ways &#8211; it does fall under the rules and it doesn&#8217;t fall under the rules. So the answer is it hasn&#8217;t been clarified and currently it is roulette by District Judge.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tonyross</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/09/catching-up-s21-and-tenants-deposits/#comment-1131</link> <dc:creator>tonyross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:59:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/290#comment-1131</guid> <description>Has the point about a deposit  being retained from a previous tenancy, and thus not paid after April 2007 been clarified yet?- in terms of it being excempt from the TDS scheme rules.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the point about a deposit  being retained from a previous tenancy, and thus not paid after April 2007 been clarified yet?- in terms of it being excempt from the TDS scheme rules.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
