<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Call me Sibyl</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/call-me-sibyl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/call-me-sibyl/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Julian W</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/call-me-sibyl/#comment-1029</link> <dc:creator>Julian W</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:17:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/256#comment-1029</guid> <description>Dear Sybil
Any thoughts on the 3.30 at Doncaster (the Underwater Stakes)?
More to the point, the Attorney-General&#039;s announcement is certainly a good start, but it will be interesting to see to what extent the promised review of the A-G&#039;s role will encompass a third conflict which you did not mention in your blog a week ago, namely the potential conflict between the A-G&#039;s role as both government legal adviser and a member of that same government. This problem was also highlighted by Lord Goldsmith&#039;s unconvincing account of the changes to his advice on the legality of the Iraq war in the two opinions he delivered on that question in March 2003. The independence of legal advice is a basic ethical premise on which the profession is built(in theory at least). It is unfortunate to say the least that the role of the ex officio head of the independent Bar is constructed so as to bring that very independence into question.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sybil</p><p>Any thoughts on the 3.30 at Doncaster (the Underwater Stakes)?</p><p>More to the point, the Attorney-General&#8217;s announcement is certainly a good start, but it will be interesting to see to what extent the promised review of the A-G&#8217;s role will encompass a third conflict which you did not mention in your blog a week ago, namely the potential conflict between the A-G&#8217;s role as both government legal adviser and a member of that same government. This problem was also highlighted by Lord Goldsmith&#8217;s unconvincing account of the changes to his advice on the legality of the Iraq war in the two opinions he delivered on that question in March 2003. The independence of legal advice is a basic ethical premise on which the profession is built(in theory at least). It is unfortunate to say the least that the role of the ex officio head of the independent Bar is constructed so as to bring that very independence into question.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
