<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Blawg Review #115</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: What makes a good blawg? : Binary Law</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1028</link> <dc:creator>What makes a good blawg? : Binary Law</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:25:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1028</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Nearly Legal (July 2007) [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Nearly Legal (July 2007) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blawg Review of the Year Nominations &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1027</link> <dc:creator>Blawg Review of the Year Nominations &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1027</guid> <description>[...] many that stand out.  My nominations reflect my own leanings, legal and literary: Blawg Reviews #115  #116 #131 #125  #134 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many that stand out.  My nominations reflect my own leanings, legal and literary: Blawg Reviews #115  #116 #131 #125  #134 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blawg Review # 141 &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1026</link> <dc:creator>Blawg Review # 141 &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:43:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1026</guid> <description>[...] a specialist in housing matters, was able to take time away from such matters to report in his own Blawg Review 115 on the extraordinary episode of the flashing Court of Appeal judge and the evidence given about his [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a specialist in housing matters, was able to take time away from such matters to report in his own Blawg Review 115 on the extraordinary episode of the flashing Court of Appeal judge and the evidence given about his [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Head of Legal: Blawg Review 115</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1025</link> <dc:creator>Head of Legal: Blawg Review 115</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1025</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] an excellent Blawg Review by Nearly Legal. The British really are [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] an excellent Blawg Review by Nearly Legal. The British really are [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1024</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:18:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1024</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Blawg Review #117&lt;/strong&gt;
Blawg Review #117 is now available at Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer.
While I was away on vacation, several quality Blawg Reviews have come and gone.  But they are worth checking out: Blawg Review #116 at Corporate Blawg UK; Blawg Review #115 at Nearl...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blawg Review #117</strong></p><p>Blawg Review #117 is now available at Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer.</p><p>While I was away on vacation, several quality Blawg Reviews have come and gone.  But they are worth checking out: Blawg Review #116 at Corporate Blawg UK; Blawg Review #115 at Nearl&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Publawyer: Reflections and Musings on YL v Birmingham</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1023</link> <dc:creator>Publawyer: Reflections and Musings on YL v Birmingham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:26:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1023</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] have covered pretty much all the interesting issues while I&#039;ve been away. Nearly Legal&#039;s extensive Blawg review (I counted a bumper crop of 46 links, including one to this humble effort - Thanks NL!) is [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] have covered pretty much all the interesting issues while I&#8217;ve been away. Nearly Legal&#8217;s extensive Blawg review (I counted a bumper crop of 46 links, including one to this humble effort &#8211; Thanks NL!) is [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Appellate Law &#38; Practice: July 2007</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1022</link> <dc:creator>Appellate Law &#38; Practice: July 2007</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:47:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1022</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] is a Blawg Review going on at Nearly Legal. The guy is a Brit, but he says a lot of interesting things about criminal procedure and [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] is a Blawg Review going on at Nearly Legal. The guy is a Brit, but he says a lot of interesting things about criminal procedure and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: contact</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1020</link> <dc:creator>contact</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:50:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1020</guid> <description>Eoin,
Heavens above, I couldn&#039;t go through that every week, but your very generous words are much appreciated. It would be fair to say that the UK and Irish contingent (and indeed others) were a tad modest in their approach to self-promotion ;-) (Oh, and I linked to the Opera post a week or so ago - good stuff).
B de J,
Thank you very much and my pleasure, respectively.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eoin,</p><p>Heavens above, I couldn&#8217;t go through that every week, but your very generous words are much appreciated. It would be fair to say that the UK and Irish contingent (and indeed others) were a tad modest in their approach to self-promotion ;-) (Oh, and I linked to the Opera post a week or so ago &#8211; good stuff).</p><p>B de J,</p><p>Thank you very much and my pleasure, respectively.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cearta</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1016</link> <dc:creator>Cearta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1016</guid> <description>Hi Nearly,
Thanks for the link; much appreciated - the restaurant critic libel cases are a lot of fun, almost as much as the similar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/the-manifest-destiny-of-critics’-fair-comment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;opera critic&lt;/a&gt; case. More to the point however, thanks also for the wonderful Blawg Review Carnival post; it was fantastic. I should perhaps reassure lawyer-2-be that you found my post all by yourself, I hadn&#039;t - this time :-) - done anything quite as nakedly self-promotional as sending you the link, and I suspect that a great many (if not most) of your links were indeed your own selection.
Can you do the Carnival post every week?
Eoin (Cearta.ie)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nearly,</p><p>Thanks for the link; much appreciated &#8211; the restaurant critic libel cases are a lot of fun, almost as much as the similar <a
href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/the-manifest-destiny-of-critics’-fair-comment/" rel="nofollow">opera critic</a> case. More to the point however, thanks also for the wonderful Blawg Review Carnival post; it was fantastic. I should perhaps reassure lawyer-2-be that you found my post all by yourself, I hadn&#8217;t &#8211; this time :-) &#8211; done anything quite as nakedly self-promotional as sending you the link, and I suspect that a great many (if not most) of your links were indeed your own selection.</p><p>Can you do the Carnival post every week?</p><p>Eoin (Cearta.ie)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Public Defender Stuff &#187; Public defender intern shot and killed</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/07/blawg-review-115/#comment-1015</link> <dc:creator>Public Defender Stuff &#187; Public defender intern shot and killed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:18:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/250#comment-1015</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Comments Blawg Review #115 at Nearly Legal on How we sleep at nightAudacity on Public Defender: We&#039;re overloadedGideon on New designambimb on [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img
src="http://nearlylegal.co.ukblog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] Comments Blawg Review #115 at Nearly Legal on How we sleep at nightAudacity on Public Defender: We&#8217;re overloadedGideon on New designambimb on [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
