<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Champagne does not affect professional judgment</title> <atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/06/champagne-does-not-affect-professional-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/06/champagne-does-not-affect-professional-judgment/</link> <description>Housing law news and comment</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Pupilblog</title><link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2007/06/champagne-does-not-affect-professional-judgment/#comment-991</link> <dc:creator>Pupilblog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/241#comment-991</guid> <description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;about the behaviour of one of the pupils two years ago at the same party, but neither of us has been able to find anyone willing to spill the beans, even after a few drinks.      With the exception of one clanger, I found the party useful, I think. Nearly Legal has just posted on the subject of schmoozing by barristers, and includes a link to a recent article by David Pannick QC on the same subject. I chatted to several solicitors I haven&#039;t seen for a while and attempted to strike a delicate balance between&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="><img
src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>about the behaviour of one of the pupils two years ago at the same party, but neither of us has been able to find anyone willing to spill the beans, even after a few drinks.      With the exception of one clanger, I found the party useful, I think. Nearly Legal has just posted on the subject of schmoozing by barristers, and includes a link to a recent article by David Pannick QC on the same subject. I chatted to several solicitors I haven&#8217;t seen for a while and attempted to strike a delicate balance between</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
