<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the red corner, art, in the blue corner, copyright.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2006/09/in-the-red-corner-art-in-the-blue-corner-copyright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2006/09/in-the-red-corner-art-in-the-blue-corner-copyright/</link>
	<description>The Joy of Housing Law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Binary Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where culture comes from</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2006/09/in-the-red-corner-art-in-the-blue-corner-copyright/#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>Binary Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where culture comes from</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] to the extent that I tend to the view that the two are incompatible. I wrote a post on this at http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/54 on contemporary visual [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] to the extent that I tend to the view that the two are incompatible. I wrote a post on this at <a href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/54" rel="nofollow">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/54</a> on contemporary visual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nearlylegal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art and copyright 2</title>
		<link>http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2006/09/in-the-red-corner-art-in-the-blue-corner-copyright/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>nearlylegal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art and copyright 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] Following on from this post, which suggested a strong incompatibility between contemporary art practices and copyright law in terms of the potential failure of copyright to cover some contemporary art, I&#8217;d like to take a quick look at the reverse - how contemporary art approaches copyright. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following on from this post, which suggested a strong incompatibility between contemporary art practices and copyright law in terms of the potential failure of copyright to cover some contemporary art, I&#8217;d like to take a quick look at the reverse - how contemporary art approaches copyright. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
