More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Allocation
ASB
Assured Shorthold tenancy
assured-tenancy
Benefits and care
Deposits
Disrepair
Homeless
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Nuisance
Possession
Regulation and planning
right-to-buy
secure-tenancy
Succession
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

The mystery of the Minister’s many bits

04/05/2016

Doctor Evil

There might be much to mock and/or weep at in the Housing and Planning Bill, but this afternoon reached a degree of the surreal, as the Bill returned to the House of Lords following the Govt vote in the Commons to reject all the Lords amendments.

Shelter today released a report showing that, on the Government’s own estimate of needing to raise £4.5 billion from councils to fund Housing Association Right to Buy, the result would be a requirement for councils to sell off (not under right to buy, remember, just sell as vacant) some 23,503 council homes a year, for an average of £26 million per council per year. This is some 6 times more than the Government’s previous suggestions.

The Housing Minister took to twitter to announce he didn’t agree with this analysis. And why?

 

He had drawn in 16 million ‘pieces of data’. Blimey. What a lot. He’d give us no idea what the data is, or what it says, but heavens what a lot of it!

Later, as the House of Lords spent the afternoon telling the Government not to be so bloody stupid over some of the rejected amends, the 16 million pieces of data emerged again, this time announced by Baroness Williams.

 

The assembled Lords asked if she could tell them what the data was and said. No, no she couldn’t. They were still analysing it.

So, the Government and CLG have no idea if Shelter is right or not. Brandon is still looking at the 16 million bits of data. But he doesn’t agree with Shelter anyway. Presumably on the basis that he has more data than they do, even if he doesn’t know what it is yet. The Minister’s mysterious bits…

On such foundations is the forced sell off of council housing stock built. Because the Lords will be rebuffed again on this, the Government has insisted. But never mind, Brandon has 16 million bits of data, so it will all be OK.

PS. I might have been responsible for turning pieces into bits on twitter. It rather stuck.

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.

0 Comments

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Nuts & Bolts #11 – Brandon’s Bits | Our Castle's Strength - […] on this statistic, as did the Lords during their Housing and Planning Bill debate – see Giles Peaker’s blog…

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading