More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Allocation
ASB
Assured Shorthold tenancy
assured-tenancy
Benefits and care
Deposits
Disrepair
Homeless
Housing Conditions
Housing law - All
Introductory and Demoted tenancies
Leasehold and shared ownership
Licences and occupiers
Mortgage possession
Nuisance
Possession
Regulation and planning
right-to-buy
secure-tenancy
Succession
Trusts and Estoppel
Unlawful eviction and harassment

The bottled water of principle

18/09/2010

There is an interesting interview with Baroness Hale of the Supreme Court on the UKSC blog, (also reposted on the Guardian Law site, which has been really rather good since launch).

Lady HaleIt is well worth a read, not only for Lady Hale fighting for the separation of the Supreme Court from Government by insisting on bottled water in the canteen in the face of MoJ policy, but for her views on the operation of the Supreme Court. There is much of interest on diversity on the bench and in the SC, and, for housing lawyers, particularly on the question of socio-economic ‘positive rights’, where she sees a mismatch between Europe and home grown human rights positions. On Article 8 and housing:

in respect of article 8 and social housing, if a public authority has an obligation not to evict a tenant if this would be a disproportionate interference with his right to respect for his home, this might begin to look like a positive right to a home, although Strasburg might never say that.

Whether or not this might be an indication of Baroness Hale’s (and indeed the Supreme Court’s) thinking on Pinnock and the expected ECtHR decision in Kay is anyone’s guess. Though it might be somewhat impertinent, my view would be that Lady Hale may be making a leap in seeing the prospect of a ‘right to a home’ in a proportionality review of a decision to seek eviction, where perhaps the right would actually be not to have a home removed from one unless this was a proportionate means to an end.

I can’t see a ‘right to a home’ in the train of ECtHR decisions so far. But I am but a solicitor and share only a state eduction with the Baroness.

Giles Peaker is a solicitor and partner in the Housing and Public Law team at Anthony Gold Solicitors in South London. You can find him on Linkedin and on Twitter. Known as NL round these parts.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply (We can't offer advice on individual issues)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.